Subject	For the extra $50, It looks like RPS wins (n/m)
Posted by	myndblur on July 30, 2006 at 6:27 PM
	This message has been viewed 55 times.
In Reply To	RPS > *.* (n/m) posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on July 30, 2006 at 05:15 PM
Message
Follow Ups	JWT Flywheel vs. Fidanza Flywheel - myndblur 12:15:48 07/30/06 this may help a bit... - timathiscott 12:21:33 07/30/06 Get rps segmented. (n/m) - sfarrah 12:36:05 07/30/06 rps segmented (n/m) - mousersix (San Antonio) 12:53:54 07/30/06 "right" choice is to buy one of them - LJZTT 13:24:36 07/30/06 The correct choice is to get a segmented flywheel. - Kenny 21:49:21 07/30/06 Hmm weird...care to pepsi challenge what type of flywheel - LJZTT 11:50:49 07/31/06 Until it warps, you're right. The segmented don't warp. - Kenny 13:34:55 07/31/06 hm, when? (n/m) - LJZTT 16:08:58 07/31/06 Before an RPS would need replacing. (n/m) - Kenny 19:02:06 07/31/06 oh so before the sun explodes? Sounds like plenty of time to - LJZTT 19:46:23 07/31/06 Solid insert flywheels have a tendency to warp at the power - Guapo 20:00:27 07/31/06 It's fairly common for it to occur within a few years. - Kenny 22:37:18 07/31/06 They are the same thing. (n/m) - Snoguitar 14:13:12 07/30/06 2nd - ZLover4Life 14:29:54 07/30/06 RPS*** (n/m) - Chase86(WV) 14:17:12 07/30/06 RPS fa sho - TTFairladyZ 14:20:39 07/30/06 342nd on RPS (n/m) - xZeler8 15:45:33 07/30/06 RPS > *.* (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 17:15:55 07/30/06 For the extra $50, It looks like RPS wins (n/m) - myndblur 18:27:57 07/30/06 Re: JWT Flywheel vs. Fidanza Flywheel - Z_spec 22:12:16 07/30/06 RPS is the choice to make... - 92naz32 10:10:29 07/31/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.